Enterprise Level Business System :: essays research papers

Enterprise-Level Business System Assessment some(prenominal) key atomic number 18as should be reviewed when assessing an enterprise-level business system. It is commonly known that errors made in the early stages of the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) give the sack be quite costly. Therefore, careful planning, during the early stages of system development, is crucial. The use of information-gathering tools, during the summary stage, is reclaimable and recommended. Following forget be a review of several of the information-gathering techniques available. The public-service corporation of business process mapping orders, and which mapping tools should be implemented during the analysis process, will also be discussed. In closing, a review of the methods an analyst gutter use to confirm an effective understanding of the project requirements will be provided.There are several information-gathering methods available. One such method is a review of the current documentatio n or Standard operate Procedures (SOPs) of the business. Reviewing documentation net provide current and historical information, and has minimal push on the daily routine of the business. Negatively, the documentation review process can be clock time-consuming, and many processes may not be documented. Observing and documenting the activities performed by an individual or a particular system are extra methods used to retrieve information. The observation method can be quite reliable, but also may be costly and time-consuming. In addition, observing an individual may make him/her feel uncomfortable, thus impacting the way he/she performs. Another information-gathering technique is to elicit feedback about business requirements and processes from the users of the system. Feedback from actual users can be elicited via questionnaires or in-person interviews. There are benefits and disadvantages in using each type of technique. Questionnaires are a fairly twopenny methodology, and results can typically be turned around quickly. Survey instruments can safeguard the interviewees anonymity and can be completed at the users convenience. Unfortunately, information retrieved from questionnaires may not be genuinely detailed since the ability to probe for additional information is limited. In addition, lacking(p) data is irretrievable. In-person interviewing may provide greater details because the analyst has the ability to probe and interact with the interviewee. The analyst also has the ability to find oneself any nonverbal communication the interviewee may be expressing. On the level side, interviews can be quite time-consuming, and as seen with other methods, increased time typically means increased cost. Another technique is the Joint applications programme Design (JAD) session. A JAD session consists of a group of key stakeholders who are teamed together to discuss their opinions and the needs of the system or business.